Have gasoline prices got your anger fueled? : SalisburyPostables.com

Coming next week, Norris Dearmon, local historian and columnist for the Kannapolis Citizen, will have a column in the paper about gasoline prices. Dearmon remembers when gasoline prices were no where near where they are now and when Exxon Mobile was the local Esso station.

Do you remember when gasoline was not $3 a gallon? Dearmon does and he shares his thoughts with us next week. Share your thoughts on gasoline prices here and maybe you’ll see them in the next issue of the Kannapolis Citizen.

3 Responses to “Have gasoline prices got your anger fueled?”

Whig Kid on February 14th, 2008 2:56 pm

My “thoughts on gasoline prices” are that people need to make lifestyle choices that are more responsible in where they live, work and play. The extra costs are but one consequence of a recklessly luxurious lifestyle, particularly when climate change is factored in.

Those of us who live in Salisbury, and those residents along Hwy. 150 who are preparing to be welcomed to Salisbury, will have short enough commutes that gas prices will not impact us too much. Those who choose to live way out in the county, on the other hand, will likely spend more on gasoline than any property taxes the city could possibly add to your soon to be annexed area. Just think of it as another amenity offered by your close proximity to Salisbury.
Holsie on February 14th, 2008 9:20 pm

I’m fairly new to the area. Gasoline prices here are not so high compared to California, though. So far, Kannapolis seems to be a neighborly place. As gas prices rise, perhaps more people will choose to live short distances from work. It could further connect us with our neighbors, and therefore, ourselves.
wb20 on February 14th, 2008 11:35 pm

A bit of perspective for the alarmists….

For instance, let’s look at 1955, a year most of us associate with big cars, big engines, and cheap fuel – automotive glory days, as it were. Gasoline sold for 29 cents per gallon. But one dollar in 1955 was worth more than one dollar today. If we were using today’s dollars, gasoline would have cost $1.76 per gallon in 1955.

Gasoline now costs around $3.00, so we are worse off than in 1955, right? No. Because we were poorer in 1955 than we are today, $1.76 then had a bigger impact on the pocketbook (that is, it represented a larger fraction of income) than $1.76 today. If we adjust gasoline prices not only for inflation but also changes in disposable per capita income (defined as income minus taxes), gasoline today would have to cost $5.17 per gallon to have the same impact as 29 cents in 1955.

Here’s the link to the full article: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6440

Got something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Have gasoline prices got your anger fueled?

eNews & Updates